Defect Lawyers

This digital document is an article from Trial, published by Association of Trial Lawyers of America on March 1, 1999. The length of the article is 4235 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: Other similar incidents (OSI) evidence is the most powerful way a plaintiff’s attorney can persuade a jury that an automobile is defective. This is because it provides direct evidence of a car’s safety defects and provides the basis for a punitive damages argument. As proof of the key issue of foreseeability, the plaintiff must prove that the manufacturer knew or should have known of the threatened danger of injury and still did not take steps to protects against it.Sources of OSI evidence, common defensive tactics, and keys to the admissibility of such evidence are listed.

Citation Details
Title: Proving design defects with other similar incidents evidence.
Author: Tab Turner
Publication: Trial (Magazine/Journal)
Date: March 1, 1999
Publisher: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Volume: 35 Issue: 3 Page: 42(1)

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Proving design defects with other similar incidents evidence.: An article from: Trial